Commit Graph

26 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erin Call
34b9ec1c4c Run the Help step by default [#15] 2019-12-26 10:47:42 -08:00
Erin Call
161960e55e Rename Delete to Uninstall [#4]
Helm3 renamed its delete command to uninstall. We should still accept
helm_command=delete for drone-helm compatibility, but the internals
should use Helm's preferred name.
2019-12-19 15:04:33 -08:00
Erin Call
68a2c3cc86 Merge branch 'master' into helm-delete 2019-12-19 11:34:44 -08:00
Erin Call
7849b28532 Format the Delete struct less weirdly [#4]
I thought it was a golang style convention to put a blank line between
public and private struct fields, but apparently I imagined that.
2019-12-19 11:11:50 -08:00
Erin Call
c033c8c45e Format the Lint struct non-weirdly [#3]
I thought it was a golang style convention to put a blank line between
public and private struct fields, but apparently I imagined that.
2019-12-19 11:09:39 -08:00
Erin Call
30e1e3b99f Assert that Lint.Prepare sets cmd.Stdout/Stderr [#3] 2019-12-19 10:26:33 -08:00
Erin Call
b93917c857 Use better expectations in lint_test [#3]
The tests need to allow calls to Stdout/Stderr so they don't get
"Unexpected call" errors from gomock, but these tests aren't meant to
assert that the calls actually happened. Using .AnyTimes allows 0 or
more calls.
2019-12-19 10:21:11 -08:00
Erin Call
5de156f823 Extract Plan's InitKube creation [#4]
It's `func initKube` rather than `var initKube = func` because initKube
is not meant to be returned by determineSteps.
2019-12-18 17:13:17 -08:00
Erin Call
f398ee5724 Instantiate a Delete when appropriate [#4]
"delete" would be a more natural name for the instantiation function,
but that's a reserved word in golang.
2019-12-18 16:58:31 -08:00
Erin Call
a21d6ad61f Implement a Delete Step [#4] 2019-12-18 11:47:15 -08:00
Erin Call
84ac019838 Add the --namespace flag in Lint.Prepare [#3]
I don't know whether this is necessary; I'm just following drone-helm's
lead. At worst, helm will accept the flag, so it's at least *safe* to
include.
2019-12-18 10:38:33 -08:00
Erin Call
7e24756ad8 Instantiate a Lint when cfg.Command is "lint" [#3] 2019-12-17 17:14:39 -08:00
Erin Call
a6a2d6e6a3 Require a nonempty chart in Lint.Prepare [#3] 2019-12-17 17:01:22 -08:00
Erin Call
a6b7e06bd2 Implement the debug flag in lint [#3] 2019-12-17 17:01:18 -08:00
Erin Call
51800c18d7 Implement the various values flags in lint [#3] 2019-12-17 17:01:11 -08:00
Erin Call
991bbf97b4 Create a Lint step [#3]
Still need global flags and checks for mandatory settings, but the basic
functionality is there.
2019-12-17 17:01:06 -08:00
Erin Call
aa04830600 Populate DryRun when building an Upgrade step 2019-12-17 09:23:44 -08:00
Erin Call
1560c05100 Fail early if chart or release is missing 2019-12-16 17:02:56 -08:00
Erin Call
e4fa70239e Implement config flags for helm upgrade 2019-12-16 16:55:05 -08:00
Erin Call
13c663e906 Initialize kubernetes config on upgrade
This change revealed more about how the system needs to work, so there
are some supporting changes:

* helm.upgrade and helm.help are now vars rather than raw functions.
    This allows unit tests to target the "which step should we run"
    logic directly by comparing function pointers, rather than having to
    configure/prepare a fully-valid Plan and then infer the logic’s
    correctness based on the Plan’s state.
* configuration that's specific to kubeconfig initialization is now part
    of the InitKube struct rather than run.Config, since other steps
    shouldn’t need access to those settings (particularly the secrets).
* Step.Execute now receives a run.Config so it can log debug output.
2019-12-16 15:41:04 -08:00
Erin Call
4cbb4922fb Implement the debug flag and help command
I'm vacillating about the choice to have separate Config structs in the
`helm` and `run` packages. I can't tell whether it's "good separation of
concerns" or "cumbersome and over-engineered." It seems appropriate at
the moment, though.
2019-12-10 15:33:50 -08:00
Erin Call
8d66036252 Brush all the lint off this code I wrote in a haze 2019-12-09 10:53:32 -08:00
Erin Call
e3051ec72e Replicate most of drone-helm's config 2019-12-09 09:58:42 -08:00
Erin Call
238ede6f9e Actual drone-invokable helm commands 2019-12-05 14:35:25 -08:00
Erin Call
e77f6842b9 Non-DI approach to the exec.Command mocking 2019-12-05 09:57:59 -08:00
Erin Call
990d1856d8 Very rough code that can helm install
The recommended way to test code that uses exec.Cmd involves setting up
a real exec.Cmd that invokes `go test` with additional arguments that
fire off a specially-constructed test that behaves the way the mocked-
out script would be expected to do. It's a sensible way to test exec.Cmd
itself, but for code that merely invokes it, I think it makes more sense
to use actual mocks.
2019-12-04 12:41:37 -08:00