Commit Graph

102 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erin Call
d53a1ed942 Merge branch 'master' into testplan 2019-12-26 12:26:07 -08:00
Erin Call
167b53691b Put HelmCommand in Help, not run.Config [#15] 2019-12-26 12:23:56 -08:00
Erin Call
b1899dee56 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into help-by-default 2019-12-26 12:23:14 -08:00
Erin Call
8f2d4bec49 Merge branch 'master' into testplan 2019-12-26 12:08:30 -08:00
Erin Call
b2066961e1 Merge branch 'master' into kubeconfig-tests 2019-12-26 11:55:32 -08:00
Joachim Hill-Grannec
253a4465f8 Merge branch 'master' into config-fixup 2019-12-26 11:36:55 -08:00
Erin Call
6d28b7b28a Return an error on unknown commands [#15]
I'm probably overthinking this--explicitly calling help is a strange and
unusual case--but it doesn't really hurt, so I'm going for it.
2019-12-26 11:29:33 -08:00
Joachim Hill-Grannec
81c4877a92 Merge branch 'master' into noncompulsory-certificate 2019-12-26 11:27:43 -08:00
Erin Call
34b9ec1c4c Run the Help step by default [#15] 2019-12-26 10:47:42 -08:00
Erin Call
6b331fdf03 Check the validity of the kubeconfig template [#13]
It's a little tricky to find a balance between "brittle" and "thorough"
in this test--I'd like to verify that e.g. the certificate is in
clusters[0].cluster.certificate-authority-data, not at the root. On the
other hand, we can't actually show that it's a valid kubeconfig file
without actually *using* it, so there's a hard upper limit on the
strength of the assertions. I've settled on verifying that all the
settings make it into the file and the file is syntactically-valid yaml.
2019-12-25 10:11:14 -08:00
Erin Call
cb58b5a021 Phrase errors in Execute the same as in Prepare [#33] 2019-12-24 15:49:47 -08:00
Erin Call
d86ac72529 Test Plan.Execute [#33] 2019-12-24 15:47:26 -08:00
Erin Call
52c9fb552c Ensure the plan test mocks' expectations are met [#33] 2019-12-24 15:33:50 -08:00
Erin Call
08ddf5e27a Log debug output in helm.Config [#9]
Redacting KubeToken may not be sufficient, since it's possible that
someone would put secrets in Values or StringValues. Unilaterally
redacting those seems unhelpful, though, since they may be the very
thing the user is trying to debug. I've settled on redacting the obvious
field without trying to promise that all sensitive data will be hidden.
2019-12-24 11:08:09 -08:00
Erin Call
4ba1e694d9 Use a go-idiomatic constructor for helm.Config [#9] 2019-12-24 10:41:01 -08:00
Erin Call
10e7e7fee5 Document the Config struct's behavior correctly [#19] [#9] 2019-12-23 16:45:09 -08:00
Erin Call
285e9d98a4 Allow a configurable env var prefix [#19]
I'd like to keep Prefix's scope fairly limited, because it has potential
to spiral into something magnificently complex. You get one prefix
setting, it goes in `settings` not `environment`, end of feature.
2019-12-23 16:36:37 -08:00
Erin Call
db87bd0507 Require no-error in config tests [#9] 2019-12-23 15:52:01 -08:00
Erin Call
e2f53f3b08 Process non-prefixed forms of all config settings [#9]
Trying to guess in advance which part of the config a user will put in
the `settings` section and which they'll put in `environment` is a
fool's errand. Just let everything go in either place.

The ServiceAccount field only had an `envconfig` tag (as opposed to
`split_words`) because that triggered envconfig to look for the non-
prefixed form. Now that we're finding non-prefixed forms of everything,
we can use the clearer/more concise tag.

Note that TestPopulateWithConflictingVariables isn't meant to say
"here's what behavior we *want*" so much as "here's what the behavior
*is*." I don't think one thing is any better than the other, but we
should know which one we're getting.
2019-12-23 15:34:08 -08:00
Erin Call
c4c136b021 Do envconfig-loading in config.go (and test it!) [#9] 2019-12-23 15:10:00 -08:00
Erin Call
ef4db923cd Use a plain string for helm.Config.Command [#9]
I'm leaving the no-op test file in place because my next step is to add
new behavior that will require testing.
2019-12-23 14:06:05 -08:00
Erin Call
ae9cb59a1f No typo inthe helm.Config docs [#9] 2019-12-23 14:03:51 -08:00
Erin Call
ad5baea3e6 Document helm.Config's struct fields more clearly [#9] 2019-12-23 14:02:46 -08:00
Erin Call
4755f502b5 Always use the default kubeconfig file path [#20] 2019-12-23 12:47:16 -08:00
Erin Call
3eb90651d1 Rough-draft upgrade settings documentation [#8] 2019-12-23 09:49:01 -08:00
Erin Call
dc4ecb6b91 Allow an empty Certificate setting [#29]
I just plain misunderstood how kubernetes CAs worked!
2019-12-20 16:11:20 -08:00
Erin Call
197a377a82 Prod maintainers to keep the docs and code in sync [#8]
Offhand I don't see a way to ensure it programmatically, but I feel like
I should at least make an attempt.
2019-12-20 10:05:50 -08:00
Erin Call
161960e55e Rename Delete to Uninstall [#4]
Helm3 renamed its delete command to uninstall. We should still accept
helm_command=delete for drone-helm compatibility, but the internals
should use Helm's preferred name.
2019-12-19 15:04:33 -08:00
Erin Call
68a2c3cc86 Merge branch 'master' into helm-delete 2019-12-19 11:34:44 -08:00
Erin Call
7849b28532 Format the Delete struct less weirdly [#4]
I thought it was a golang style convention to put a blank line between
public and private struct fields, but apparently I imagined that.
2019-12-19 11:11:50 -08:00
Erin Call
c033c8c45e Format the Lint struct non-weirdly [#3]
I thought it was a golang style convention to put a blank line between
public and private struct fields, but apparently I imagined that.
2019-12-19 11:09:39 -08:00
Erin Call
30e1e3b99f Assert that Lint.Prepare sets cmd.Stdout/Stderr [#3] 2019-12-19 10:26:33 -08:00
Erin Call
b93917c857 Use better expectations in lint_test [#3]
The tests need to allow calls to Stdout/Stderr so they don't get
"Unexpected call" errors from gomock, but these tests aren't meant to
assert that the calls actually happened. Using .AnyTimes allows 0 or
more calls.
2019-12-19 10:21:11 -08:00
Erin Call
5de156f823 Extract Plan's InitKube creation [#4]
It's `func initKube` rather than `var initKube = func` because initKube
is not meant to be returned by determineSteps.
2019-12-18 17:13:17 -08:00
Erin Call
f398ee5724 Instantiate a Delete when appropriate [#4]
"delete" would be a more natural name for the instantiation function,
but that's a reserved word in golang.
2019-12-18 16:58:31 -08:00
Erin Call
a21d6ad61f Implement a Delete Step [#4] 2019-12-18 11:47:15 -08:00
Erin Call
84ac019838 Add the --namespace flag in Lint.Prepare [#3]
I don't know whether this is necessary; I'm just following drone-helm's
lead. At worst, helm will accept the flag, so it's at least *safe* to
include.
2019-12-18 10:38:33 -08:00
Erin Call
7e24756ad8 Instantiate a Lint when cfg.Command is "lint" [#3] 2019-12-17 17:14:39 -08:00
Erin Call
a6a2d6e6a3 Require a nonempty chart in Lint.Prepare [#3] 2019-12-17 17:01:22 -08:00
Erin Call
a6b7e06bd2 Implement the debug flag in lint [#3] 2019-12-17 17:01:18 -08:00
Erin Call
51800c18d7 Implement the various values flags in lint [#3] 2019-12-17 17:01:11 -08:00
Erin Call
991bbf97b4 Create a Lint step [#3]
Still need global flags and checks for mandatory settings, but the basic
functionality is there.
2019-12-17 17:01:06 -08:00
Erin Call
aa04830600 Populate DryRun when building an Upgrade step 2019-12-17 09:23:44 -08:00
Erin Call
1560c05100 Fail early if chart or release is missing 2019-12-16 17:02:56 -08:00
Erin Call
e4fa70239e Implement config flags for helm upgrade 2019-12-16 16:55:05 -08:00
Erin Call
13c663e906 Initialize kubernetes config on upgrade
This change revealed more about how the system needs to work, so there
are some supporting changes:

* helm.upgrade and helm.help are now vars rather than raw functions.
    This allows unit tests to target the "which step should we run"
    logic directly by comparing function pointers, rather than having to
    configure/prepare a fully-valid Plan and then infer the logic’s
    correctness based on the Plan’s state.
* configuration that's specific to kubeconfig initialization is now part
    of the InitKube struct rather than run.Config, since other steps
    shouldn’t need access to those settings (particularly the secrets).
* Step.Execute now receives a run.Config so it can log debug output.
2019-12-16 15:41:04 -08:00
Erin Call
4cbb4922fb Implement the debug flag and help command
I'm vacillating about the choice to have separate Config structs in the
`helm` and `run` packages. I can't tell whether it's "good separation of
concerns" or "cumbersome and over-engineered." It seems appropriate at
the moment, though.
2019-12-10 15:33:50 -08:00
Erin Call
8d66036252 Brush all the lint off this code I wrote in a haze 2019-12-09 10:53:32 -08:00
Erin Call
e3051ec72e Replicate most of drone-helm's config 2019-12-09 09:58:42 -08:00
Erin Call
238ede6f9e Actual drone-invokable helm commands 2019-12-05 14:35:25 -08:00